At my cooperating center I taught
two sections of my Ag Sciences II-IV classes. This class was taught with the
same course material in two different sections, the first being taught during 3rd
period, the standard 45-minute length, while the other is during 5th
period, a 60-minute length period to accommodate the two 30-minute lunch periods
that overlap with it. There was no difference between which students were
placed into which section other than whichever fit better into their overall
class schedule.
To determine if time really does
matter, I conducted my action research study by comparing the grades of the
students in both sections against each other, using their second term grade as
their starting point and their third term grade as their end point. I compared
the overall change in grade, whether it was positive or negative, of each
individual student and the average for the class. Each student also took a
cumulative unit exam and the individual scores and class averages were also
calculated and compared between the two sections. The only differences in class
instruction for the two sections were that 5th period, the second,
longer section, received more in-class time to complete assignments, more
opportunities to ask clarifying questions, and during certain lessons received
additional examples to explain lesson objectives and content.
After collecting and analyzing my
data the results I found showed that yes the students in the 5th
period section of the class did receive higher grades on the cumulative exam
than the 3rd period section, with an average grade of 84.79 in 3rd
period and 96.18 in 5th period. The 5th period students
also had higher class grades than their peers with the average second term
grade being 89.79 and average third term grade being 90.71, as compared to the
3rd period students with an average second term grade of 80.13 and
average third term grade of 84.6.
However, upon looking at the data further I find that while the 5th
period students did have the higher grades overall, it was the 3rd
period students who appeared the have the greatest change in grade from the
second term to third term. The average change in grade for the 3rd
period class was an increase of 4.47 grade points, while the average change in
grade for the 5th period class only had an increase of 0.93 grade
points.
Based on these results, I do not
think that this study was able to show a correlation between longer class time
and academic improvement, though I do believe that there were several other
factors that impacted the study. The first is that in both 3rd and 5th
period I have several students who, due to their personal class schedule
constraints, are only able to attend class on either an A-day or a B-day, even
though the class occurs on both schedule days. The second factor that I believe
greatly impacted the study was the amount of instructional time lost due to
weather. Over the course of my student teaching internship approximately 15
school days were impacted by winter weather conditions, either through early
dismissals, late arrivals, or cancellations – which took away the majority of
the instructional time.
Due to these factors my study wasn’t
able to show if a difference in instructional time length impacted student
achievement but it did make me more aware of the variety of factors that can
impact instructional time, including seasonal weather.
No comments :
Post a Comment